Mt. Whitney Webcam 1

Webcam 1 Legend
Mt. Whitney Webcam 2

Webcam 2 Legend
Mt. Whitney Timelapse
Owens Valley North

Owens Valley North Legend
Owens Valley South

Owens Valley South Legend
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#40046 08/15/07 01:24 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
I'm heading for the South-Face-Right-Side route of Mt. Russell via the North Fork approach from the Portal. I'm opting for this route as it appears to be less exposed and I will be bringing some new climbers. Is this the right way to go?

Any tips, warnings, etc. about this route? Would a terrain belay or a hand-line be easy and reasonable to set up if my party gets queezy from the exposure?

Thanks for the input!

Skotty

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 949
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 949
depends whether you like your exposure vertical or horizontal

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 492
Member
Member

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 492
I assume you mean more exposed than the East Ridge? The South Face - Right Side is less exposed, but there is a short section of class 3 (with a few tough moves I thought) at the headwall.

Here are my pictures from about a month ago: Mt. Russell & Carillon - 7.7.07

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
Yes, I did mean which is more exposed between the South-Face-Right-Side and the East Ridge. From the ridge shots I've seen it looks like there is going to be considerably more exposed travel compared to coming from the South Face.

GigaMike, great pics. I checked them via SummitPost. How was the route finding once topping out on the headwall? Is the path of least risistance clear or did you have to poke around on either side of the ridge to find the optimum line? Also, how is the rock? Would a terrain belay or anchored hand-line be reasonable if the group gets sketchy with the exposure?

Thanks for the input!

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 460
Member
Member

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 460
Route finding is pretty straight forward when you get to the top of the headwall. I have taken several groups up that route and I do bring a small rope but have only used it once to belay a hesitant hiker back down.


Richard
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 33
Member
Member

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 33
Originally Posted By GigaMike
I assume you mean more exposed than the East Ridge? The South Face - Right Side is less exposed, but there is a short section of class 3 (with a few tough moves I thought) at the headwall.

Here are my pictures from about a month ago: Mt. Russell & Carillon - 7.7.07


Man those pix of Wes going up the Mithral Dihedral are insane!

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 949
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 949
if they truly are "new" in every sense of the word - they may not like the class III above the talus field - some of the hand holds feel loose/crumbly but in actuality "most" are ok - but if you look between your legs it will seem like there is a lot of air to fall down - best to carry a short rope for a backup. taking this route you have no alternate peak if they want to abort. I personally think the east route is the easier way and this would give you an alternate(Carillon) if some want to wait for another time.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
Member
Member

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 65
When you get to the top of the right side you still have a bit of the ridge to traverse. In addition, down climbing is usually the most intimidating part. If they don't like the idea of down climbing the right side, the east ridge is the only other option.
This link shows the approach and the ridge line for your trip.
South face left side
This is close to where the left side tops out.

Last edited by skydiveken; 08/16/07 03:51 AM.
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 176
Member
Member

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 176
Of the two routes, the East Ridge is obviously more exposed (both real and imagined) with a potential fall of 1000' vertical to either side in a worst case scenario.

The South-Right Headwall is probably only about 40-60' high, but the climbing (especially down) feels a lot more like rock climbing than scrambling.

I would hesitate to bring anyone without at least some mountain climbing experience up Russell. It's not the same as the MR.

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
Member
Member

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 19
Good suggestions and information everyone! I appreciate the insight. The group I'm taking has a few peaks each, but this will be their first experience with any significant exposure. I'll run the beta and the scarriest of images by them prior to get a feeling for what they can tolerate.

Thanks again!


Moderated by  Bob R, Doug Sr 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Mt. Whitney Weather Links


White Mountain/
Barcroft Station

Elev 12,410’

Upper Tyndall Creek
Elev 11,441’

Crabtree Meadows
Elev 10,700’

Cottonwood Lakes
Elev 10,196’

Lone Pine
Elev. 3,727’

Hunter Mountain
Elev. 6,880’

Death Valley/
Furnace Creek

Elev. -193’

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.034s Queries: 34 (0.019s) Memory: 0.7389 MB (Peak: 0.8159 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-05-01 19:24:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS