Well it's nice to see that the 'stitch' debate still rages in even the most remote corners of civilization.
I used a Nikon 8700 8.1 mp camera, it has a 'mode' that will overlap a third of the last image taken so you can re-align the next exposure. I then used a program by Ulead to put them together. Autostitch does the best job I have seen but Ulead has definite advantages, the most being the final image area per frames taken is far greater (although less accurate). Plus Ulead won't crash when the final image exceeds 8000 pixels, in fact I've done some in excess of 20,000 without any problem.
I put the image into Photoshop and had to fix the problems Ulead created so I ended up with a file that's about 300 megs when saved (probably required 1.5 gigs of ram just to play with in PS).
I've had several requests for the high rez so I put it on my website, there's now a link to it on the page listed above
If you want to play "Name that peak" here's a couple of links:
http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/panoramas/AME/Whitney-S.gif http://www.viewfinderpanoramas.org/panoramas/AME/Whitney-N.gif I find it amazing that the computer generated and photographic are identical.
mchiker, I was in the shack before and after this shot was taken, we must have met. What do you think the wind speed / temp was up there?
Thanks for all the responses
liquid.