|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1 |
Greetings - I climbed Mt. Whitney in one day - barely, if 24 hours is one day. It took me 10.5 hours to reach the summit, and 9.5 hours to descend. With an hour on top, that's 21 hours on the mountain!! I am a 55-year old female, relatively good shape, and I worked out for the year leading into my August ascent, climbed local mountains at elevation, and basically did everything I could to be as ready as possible. I have never heard of anyone taking this long! The descent was grueling - it truly took on it's own persona. My husband did it when he was 41yrs old in 12 total hours, and thinks the time it took me was just outrageous. I felt good about my "achievement", but now am wondering if I hold the record for the longest time! Anyone want to comment? (I left at 1:30a.m., reached the summit at noon. Descended at 1:00pm, and got back to my car at the portal at 10:30pm!)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 245
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 245 |
I've read than a 9-11 hr ascension time is the norm for first-timers and descent time is about 1/3 less.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 72
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 72 |
Greetings - I climbed Mt. Whitney in one day - barely, if 24 hours is one day. It took me 10.5 hours to reach the summit, and 9.5 hours to descend. With an hour on top, that's 21 hours on the mountain!! I am a 55-year old female, relatively good shape, and I worked out for the year leading into my August ascent, climbed local mountains at elevation, and basically did everything I could to be as ready as possible. I have never heard of anyone taking this long! The descent was grueling - it truly took on it's own persona. My husband did it when he was 41yrs old in 12 total hours, and thinks the time it took me was just outrageous. I felt good about my "achievement", but now am wondering if I hold the record for the longest time! Anyone want to comment? (I left at 1:30a.m., reached the summit at noon. Descended at 1:00pm, and got back to my car at the portal at 10:30pm!) So what it took you 21 hours? You did it. The question is: did you enjoy yourself? There is too much macho chatter about times. Unless you can run this thing, why worry about how fast you do it? I also suspect that in the age of the no identity internet that many claims about how fast people have done the trail may be slightly exaggerated.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 116
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 116 |
Timing is always different for me. My "norm" has been 8-9 up and about 6 down. But I take a lot of pictures and like to stop for 5-minute breaks about every 60-90 minutes. This year I was on the summit in 7 hours but I left much earlier. I think that made it faster because I didn't take nearly as many photos... No need to set speed records - enjoy the walk, the scenery, talk to folks on the trail, be safe and reach the Portal again are the only requirements.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,439 Likes: 9
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,439 Likes: 9 |
It once took me 26 hours to do the round trip. Recently, an older gentleman didn't get down before 53 hours had passed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 283
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 283 |
I don't think anyone know's what the "average" time to do the hike from the Portal to the summit and back via the main trail. Sometimes in summit registers on mountains I see people's times posted next to their names, and I know it has often taken me twice as long to get there as it took those who posted their time. I think you hear more about time from fast people, because they are proud of their speed (nothing wrong with that, but not everyone is built for speed).
No matter what your speed, you should be really proud of yourself because I'm sure the amount of people that can even do that hike is a small minority of the general population.
Kathy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 444
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 444 |
I think that what's outrageous is your husband saying anything besides "congratulations." You did something that 99+% of people couldn't do in any time.
The hike down is really grueling. You're tired and the chance of a misstep and serious injury is very real. If you're like me, your knees are screaming for mercy. It's best to just put one foot in front of the other and let it take it's own time. The worst problem is that you were too late for a beer and burger at the Portal.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 945 |
You did it. Congratulations. Harvey
I love mountain quotes - this one seems appropriate for the slowness we all experience in various degrees in the thin air up there.
He abided by the Diemburger theory which maintains that slow, no matter how slow, but constant movement is the best way to achieve progress at altitude. Joe Tasker, Everest the Cruel Way page 84
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 556
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 556 |
Ran into a lady last summer at Outpost Camp who proudly told us she was on her 35th hour of a "leisurely dayhike". This was about 1:00 pm and she had started at 2:00 am the previous day. I'd guess it took her another 5 hours to get back to the Portal at the rate she was moving, so call it 40 hours - at least.
You got to the summit, you got down safe, and you hopefully had an outrageously fulfilling experience. If you start obsessing about your time compared to others, a lot of the satisfaction you feel will evaporate. Hike your own hike and let others worry about theirs. A number of highly confident uber-athletes have been turned back before the summit because they simply couldn't cope with the altitude, so you're one up on them. Congrats!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,871
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,871 |
I'm big on "hike your hike". If it takes 6, 16, 21, 40 or 53 hours, so be it.
Based on the board postings, most would fall into the 13 to 18 hour range.
You got to Whitney Portal 21 hours after your start...and that is the most important thing.
When kiddie and I finished the first time in 16 hours...after thinking we'd breeze through in 12, Kiddie said to anxiously waiting wifey, "We're still alive!"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 202
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 202 |
Your husband was right. Your time was outrageously fantastic for you. I am faster than some and slower than others. I learned a few years ago that trying to hike at someone else's pace that I couldn't keep up with stripped a lot out of me, including some of the fun and most of what I had eaten that day. I try to remember that vomitous experience with people who are slower than me. You shouldn't hike your husband's pace anymore than you should wear his glasses. Congratulations on a great hike.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 50
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 50 |
First - I wanted to wish you huge congratulations on making it in a day. That is a major accomplishment, regardless of how long it takes.
I too, am in my fifties, and the downhill sometimes takes me longer than the uphill, thanks to my aging knees. I think that is more an age thing than anything else.
I have several health issues, including impaired lung functioning, which make me horribly out of breath at altitude. Consequently, I am consistently the slowest person I see anywhere. Once on Mt. Baldy, a rather rude young man looked at my slow pace and said "why bother". Well, I may be slow, but I enjoy every second of it, and take my very frequent breaks as an opportunity to drink in the beauty and scenery surrounding me.
I have never subscribed to the "hiking as competitive sport" attitude, so I am quite fine with always being the slowest. You are certainly not the slowest person on Whitney, and there are always quite a few people who start out really fast, burn out, and then never finish. You have to hike your own hike, at your own pace, and in your own way. Kudos to you! You did great!
It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 247
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 247 |
Well, first off, good work for summiting and getting down safely, that's the important thing. That is great.
I think the fact that you kept safely pushing on is more important and a show of character. I don't think the best response would be "outrageous", unless the person it came from can run it roundtrip in 4-5 hours like many can.
If the time it took you bothers you for whatever reason, look into ways to shorten it next time in things like gear selection, training, logistics, SLEEP, etc.
The first time I climbed it, Whitney was essentially the first time I was ever that high and I was not properly prepared, in many ways including fitness. It took about the same time up, a grueling 10hrs, though I got down quicker in about 7. My very patient g/f waited for me while I was so slow, while I am sure she could have done it an hour or more faster.
The second time it took 7hrs to get up and 5.5hrs down, third time about the same in the Spring snow.
|
|
|
|
|